OWOT alignment charts: Difference between revisions

Line 69:

Certain users are displayed as lines rather than points in order to represent them having a range of behavior.

All "good" users have a Y value of exactly 0.9.

All "good" users higher than 0.8 have a Y value of exactly 0.9, since Lime could not distinguish different levels of "goodness" between users above a certain level.

d9eoead has repeatedly criticized this chart, questioning why he's on the chaotic half. He has also questioned why many users (such as Polonez, Lemuria, Aryah, etc.) have been placed higher than they should be. He's also stated that "good" has a spectrum, and chucking the "good" users in the topmost row isn't a very good decision. He's also said that the chart may be influenced by Lime's bias (or, in the case of d9eoead's placement, Polonez's bias).<gallery mode="packed" heights="270">

[[d9eoead]] has repeatedly criticized this chart, questioning why he's on the chaotic half. He has also questioned why many users (such as [[Polonez]], [[Lemuria]], [[Aryah]], etc.) have been placed higher than they should be. He's also stated that "good" has a spectrum, and chucking the "good" users in the topmost row isn't a very good decision. He's also said that the chart may be influenced by Lime's bias (or, in the case of d9eoead's placement, Polonez's bias).<gallery mode="packed" heights="270">

File:Lime owot alignment chart 2.jpg|Entire chart + notes

File:Lime owot alignment chart 6.jpg|Zoomed in version of the "good" section