OWOT alignment charts: Difference between revisions
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
As it turned out, chaotic users were more "evil" on average than "good" users. | As it turned out, chaotic users were more "evil" on average than "good" users. | ||
Users were then labeled according to the following color scheme. | |||
# blue=lawful, green=good,red=bad | # blue=lawful, green=good,red=bad | ||
# yellow=both good & bad characteristics | # yellow=both good & bad characteristics | ||
# cyan=lawful good | |||
# magenta=lawful evil | # magenta=lawful evil | ||
# red=chaotic evil | # red=chaotic evil | ||
Lawful good(cyan) users are clustered near the top of the chart, while magenta and red are more spread out. | |||
After some thinking, ChromicQuanta decided that the data would be better suited for an OWOT user tier list, which they are currently making.<gallery mode="packed" heights=" | After some thinking, ChromicQuanta decided that the data would be better suited for an OWOT user tier list, which they are currently making.<gallery mode="packed" heights="540"> | ||
File:Chromic quanta owot alignment chart 1.png|An early version of the chart. Rather than averaging the data | File:Chromic quanta owot alignment chart 1.png|An early version of the chart. Rather than averaging the data from every response, each submission is placed separately to get a better sense of differing opinions on certain users. For instance, we can see that most opinions on Lime place him firmly in the lawful good cluster, while opinions on d9 is significantly more spread out. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||